Skip to content
MissionFest Toronto Archive

Archival record · announcement, 2017

The transition: a change of leadership before the 2018 return

The organisation's own announcement is the clearest account of what happened between the last full conference and the end. It says Mission Fest Toronto had transitioned and was ready to re-emerge in 2018 — and it explains who was leaving.

What changed

Sharon Ganesh stepped down as executive director after seven years in the role, having overseen five conferences and worked for the organisation for eleven years in total. In the statement she is quoted describing the work as a privilege, and saying it was time to move on to new opportunities.

Sam Tita, the chair, thanked her for the years of service. Wayne Hinds took over as interim executive director, leaving the board of directors after nine years to do so, having led the transition team during the period when the organisation was reorganising.

What it tells you about the wind-down

The announcement is not a closing notice. It describes an organisation reorganising with the explicit intention of returning, and the return did happen — a west regional conference in October 2018, at a smaller scale and outside Toronto. That was the last event in the record.

The full conference record runs to 2012 in the archive, with a report for 2014. The organisation itself is described on the about page.

What the notice says, in its own terms

The announcement is unusually specific for a document of its kind. Sharon Ganesh stepped down as executive director after seven years at the helm and five conferences, having worked for the organisation for eleven years in total, and tendered her resignation at the end of October 2017. She was returning to the private sector to offer support services through her own events and project management company. The notice frames the whole thing as a transition, with the organisation ready to re-emerge in 2018.

Her own words are quoted at length, and they are about relationships rather than achievements: working with the organisation had been a privilege, contributing her talents, investing in the lives of others, developing working relationships with staff, board members, the management team and volunteers. That order — staff, board, management team, volunteers — is the same order the event reports use when they thank people, and it is the order of a small organisation where those four groups overlap heavily.

Reading the dates together

Seven years at the helm and five conferences is a ratio worth pausing on: it means two of those years had no conference in them. The published record accounts for that — there was no conference in 2015, announced as a pause to plan a twentieth-anniversary event for 2016 that the record never describes. So the executive director's tenure covers the period in which the conference stopped being annual.

What followed the resignation is documented in three notices published within about a month of each other in the spring of 2018: this transition announcement, a call for volunteers, and the launch of a prayer network. Then the regional conference in Milton that October, and nothing. An interim director, Wayne Hinds, is named in the notice; no further appointment appears anywhere in the record.

The one thing this page cannot do is explain the ending, because the notice was written to announce a beginning. It says the organisation had transitioned and was ready to re-emerge, and it was published eleven months before the last event on record. Both statements are in the material, and the gap between what the second one promised and what actually followed is the shape of the whole final chapter.

One further detail belongs on the record because it is easy to misread. The notice was published under the organisation's own byline in early 2018, months after the resignation it describes took effect at the end of October 2017. A gap of that length between an event and its announcement is itself information about capacity: there was nobody in a communications role to publish it sooner.

The transition is documented from one side only. The organisation published the departure; it did not publish an appointment, a board statement or a plan, so what the re-emergence in 2018 was meant to consist of has to be read off what followed it rather than from anything written down at the time.